Deploying Your Agentic Workflow
Course Target: Bring the whole course together — design, draft, and present one end-to-end AI automation pipeline that takes a real academic-administration bottleneck from raw input to a finished, accessible, governed output you could actually deploy.
This is the capstone. You won’t learn a new tool today; you’ll integrate what you already have — scoped research (L8), structured extraction (L9), tool connection and sandboxed analysis (L10), and the governance guardrails (L11) — into one pipeline, then strengthen it through peer optimization. Deliverable: a pipeline plan, a working draft, and a 5-minute walkthrough.
Start from your bottleneck
Learning Objectives
- Design an end-to-end pipeline for a real academic-administration bottleneck, integrating skills from across the course (research, extraction, tool connection, analysis).
- Build a working draft and add the governance guardrails (de-identification, verification, human sign-off, accessibility) so it’s safe to deploy.
- Present your pipeline and give and use structured peer optimization to strengthen it before deployment.
Key Terms
Select any card to flip it. Cards are keyboard-operable — press Enter or Space.
Course Outline & Lesson Modules
What you’ll deliver
- A pipeline plan — the bottleneck, the outcome, and the mapped stages.
- A working draft — at least the riskiest steps drafted/prompted, with guardrails attached.
- A 5-minute walkthrough — what it does, how it’s guarded, and where you’re unsure — plus peer review.
What makes a pipeline deployable
- Small, checkable steps — so you can verify each, not one opaque mega-step.
- Guardrails — de-identification, verification, human sign-off, accessibility.
- An audit trail — inputs, prompts, outputs, dates — so it’s defensible.
- A clear stop/failure behavior — it asks for help or halts rather than guessing.
You’ll be assessed on the capstone rubric below — design it against those criteria from the start.
Quick check: your pipeline auto-emails a report the moment the AI finishes. What’s missing?
The human sign-off — and probably verification and an audit trail. Insert your approval before anything is sent; never let the last step be irreversible and unattended.
Exemplar — an accessible weekly program digest
The bottleneck: every week you hand-compile program updates and student-success numbers into a post. Here’s the same job as a guarded pipeline:
Pick a bottleneck → define the outcome | ▼ Gather / Research (L8: a scoped loop — sources + stop condition) ▼ Extract (L9: structured output, the "not found" rule) ▼ Connect / Analyze (L10: approved tool, sandbox, de-identified data) ▼ Assemble (data + template → draft) ▼ Verify (recompute a figure / check against the source) ▼ Sign off (YOU approve — human in the loop, L11) ▼ Deliver (accessible output — WCAG check, L11) + audit trail
Notice how each stage draws on a lesson and carries a guardrail: the research loop is scoped (L8); extraction asks for structured output (L9); the metrics are de-identified and analyzed in a sandbox (L10); a human signs off and the post is WCAG-checked before publishing (L11) — with an audit trail throughout.
Quick check: which two stages should almost never be dropped?
Verify and Sign off. Speed is the point of the others; trust and safety come from those two.
Run every item against your design — copy and keep it:
Capstone integration checklist — apply each to your pipeline: [ ] Bottleneck & outcome — a real recurring task, with a clear definition of "done." [ ] Scope (L8) — bounded steps and a stop condition; no endless crawl. [ ] Extraction (L9) — ask for structured output; mark missing fields "not found." [ ] Tools & data (L10) — only approved connections; sandbox for code; de-identify student data. [ ] Verification — recompute a figure / check output against the source. [ ] Human sign-off (L11) — a person approves before any irreversible action. [ ] Accessibility (L11) — run the four-principle WCAG check on the output. [ ] Audit trail — keep inputs, prompts, outputs, and dates.
Each item links back to a lesson’s reusable artifact: the discovery-loop instruction (L8), the extraction template (L9), the "Should I connect this tool?" decision aid and sandbox settings (L10), and the FERPA decision aid, injection defense, and WCAG pre-publish checklist (L11).
Quick check: your pipeline never touches student data. Which items still apply?
Most of them — scope, extraction quality, verification, human sign-off, accessibility of the output, and an audit trail all still matter. De-identification is the one you can relax (because there’s no PII to protect).
Capstone Rubric
Your pipeline and walkthrough are assessed on these five criteria. Design to meet them.
| Criterion | Meets when… |
|---|---|
| Integration | Uses at least three course skills in one connected flow (e.g., scoped research + extraction + analysis/connection). |
| Guardrails | De-identifies sensitive data, includes a verification step, and requires human sign-off before any irreversible action; output is accessible. |
| Reliability | Small, checkable steps; a clear stop/failure behavior; an audit trail. |
| Fit | Targets a real, recurring bottleneck with a clearly defined outcome. |
| Presentation & peer response | Clear 5-minute walkthrough that names its own risks and folds in at least one peer optimization. |
Before You Present
A quick self-check: can you say, in one sentence each, (1) the bottleneck and outcome, (2) the stages, (3) where verification and sign-off sit, and (4) the one risk you most want a peer to pressure-test? If yes, you’re ready.
Hands-on Workspace Modules
Scope & Map
Choose your bottleneck, define the outcome, and map the pipeline stages — keeping only what you need.
- real bottleneck + clear outcome;
- stages mapped;
- data touched / de-identification noted.
Build a Draft & Guardrail It
For each stage, note the tool/prompt you’d use and attach the guardrail from the integration checklist.
- tool/prompt per stage;
- a guardrail on every risky step;
- verification + sign-off present.
Present & Peer-Optimize
Prepare your 5-minute walkthrough, then give a structured peer review against the rubric — and fold in what you receive.
- walkthrough names its own risks;
- peer review: strength + risk + optimization;
- one peer idea adopted.
Wrap-up
Sources & Further Reading
- Primary FERPA, 20 U.S.C. § 1232g; U.S. Dept. of Education, Student Privacy Policy Office (studentprivacy.ed.gov) — for any pipeline that touches student data.
- Primary Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act & WCAG 2.2 / ISO/IEC 40500:2025 (section508.gov) — for the accessibility of anything you deliver.
- Primary Your institution’s AI / acceptable-use and data-governance policy — the authority on what you may deploy and on which tools.
A capstone pipeline is only deployable once its tools are approved and its data handling is cleared — verify both with your institution before going live.